Sites that can show their readings get better prices and longer contracts. We put in the instruments, arrange the verification and bring the buyers, so your people can stay on the removal.
Three things hold up good sites: the measurement kit, chasing a verifier, and finding buyers. All three are ours.
Sensors, data pipelines and calibration schedules sit with us. You buy no hardware, maintain none of it, and put no engineering hours into data plumbing. It comes out of issuance, not your balance sheet.

Where the site profile carries it, we pay against future delivery. Capital to build with, and nobody takes equity for it.
No cold outreach. We introduce you to buyers already purchasing your pathway at your volume.
Issuance, retirements, revenue and verification status, live. Export any of it straight into an investor update or a board pack.
We have done this often enough to know where sites get stuck. The gate is deliberately narrow, because a no in week one is worth more to you than a maybe in month six.
We only work on pathways that physically take carbon out of the air and hold it for a period we can measure. If your site is avoidance or reduction, we are the wrong registry, and you'll hear that on the first call.
Building the measurement side ourselves would have cost us two years and a raise. Their kit went in over a fortnight, and we had a buyer signed inside the quarter.
Nothing up front. Instruments, verification and platform costs come back as a share of issuance, so we are paid when you are. The share moves with pathway and volume, and you'll have the number before you commit to anything.
The operational data stays yours. Readings attached to issued credits get published, which is the entire point of the model and is written plainly into the agreement. Your commercial terms, costs and internal operations never appear anywhere.
Yes, unless you have signed a specific exclusive. Most developers run a mix. The one rule is that a tonne measured on our instruments cannot also be issued somewhere else; double-issuance is the line we won't cross.
Common, and not a problem. What matters is whether the removal mechanism is sound and measurable. We have taken sites on at pilot scale and paid up front to fund the build.
Three questions: is the removal physically real and measurable, does it hold for a defined period, and are the land-rights and community safeguards real rather than drafted. We decline more applications than we accept, and we always say why.
Applications reviewed weekly
We review new applications every week and respond within five business days — including when the answer is no.